Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gimeno-Traver vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gimeno-Traver 1 - 0 Michalski
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Michalski has won 50.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gimeno-Traver, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 52.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.22% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 57.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Michalski winning 54.84% (W/L 34/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/ 369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/ 22). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 185/ 98), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gimeno-Traver winning 1 times and Michalski being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gimeno-Traver winning 2 and Michalski winning 0. The last match between Gimeno-Traver and Michalski was at the Sopot Challenger, 02-08-2018, Second, Clay with Daniel Gimeno-Traver getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:2:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gimeno-Traver and Michalski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gimeno-Traver winning 0 times and Michalski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gimeno-Traver winning 0, and Michalski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gimeno-Traver has played against opponents with an average rank of while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 254.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 47.2% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
48
High
38
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
395
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
57% (625-479)
Career Total W/L
62% (218-134)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
51% (18-17)
$1,102,200
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Daniel Michalski For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gimeno-Traver VS Michalski
Sportsbook
Offer
Gimeno-Traver VS Michalski H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:2:28 | 1:2:28 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (27/55) | 67% (24/36) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (20/27) | 29% (7/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (9/28) | 8% (1/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 78% (28/36) | 47% (26/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Gimeno-Traver VS Michalski H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Daniel Michalski
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 51% (18/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (42/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (391/386) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (15/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 53 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:59:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 331.34 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (1595/2606) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (1014/1595) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (506/1011) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (118/250) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (1062/2530) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 46% (12/14) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (18/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (9/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 84% (19/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 16% (19/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 13% (16/2) |
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
52 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
112)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sebastian Gima
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Leopold Zima
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
August Holmgren
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gimeno-Traver Vs Michalski Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gimeno-Traver are available here and Michalski photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
